Satchel Paige will undergo necropsy… on behalf of the California Horse Racing Board, as is mandatory for all accidents on the road, the accident and necropsy report are checked to find out what, if anything, could have been done to avoid the accident. First, this rule is superfluous if the violated principle is also enshrined in a binding rule of law, since Article 15:102 specifically states that the normal procedure is to examine the purpose of the rule, the seriousness of the offence and certain other elements. Or rather, Article 15:102 declares the Treaty null and void, even if there is no binding rule that is violated or where the purpose of the mandatory rule does not require the nullity of the contract and is satisfied with a less drastic effect. However, if the offence can be characterized as „fundamental,“ the contract must be void. It is clear that such a rule is too broad, too general. The biggest debate is about the importance of „sticking to it.“ Lamesa asserted that this is a law expressly prohibiting payment, not a law that could impose a fine or a fine. The court found that there were three possible meanings: „In most schools, physical education is compulsory“; „Participation is mandatory“; „Reading Required“ It makes no sense that, on average, a U.S. pilot gets caught every month trying to fly an airliner when he exceeds the legal flight limit, which is 0.04 percent more restrictive than for driving in many states, especially since they know they are being checked, it also means that others don`t get caught. , because it is not a mandatory test for all pilots on each flight. – the rules on the effects of the prohibition contract or compulsory order on the validity of the contract (15:102 PECL) and it is generally argued that, from the point of view of the „internal market“, the priority in terms of contract law is the harmonization of the various mandatory rules , in order to eliminate essential differences that cannot be resolved on the basis of the autonomy of the parties (and thus distort competition). the first leads me to another conclusion.
Rather, my priority is a common model law that defines categories and terminology and contains a comprehensive set of rules that national or regional legislators can deviate from. This is not a matter of hard harmonisation, but of a piecemeal harmonisation, of a pointillism of certain binding uniform rules; On the contrary, it is a soft but comprehensive model law. This model law should then be a binding reference for the legislature, although they retain the power to depart from it. However, this derogation should be explicit and specific, while being able to be adapted to the structure of the common frame of reference. It is precisely with regard to the harmonisation of contract law in Europe that the rules of default also play an important role in the compulsory law of consumer contracts. In meetings where we discuss the harmonization of contract law and the common framework of reference, we often hear from people who say that we only need to harmonize mandatory contract law, particularly consumer contract law, and that the rules of failure must be left to the national market or legislative bodies. However, the mandatory law of consumer contracts relies heavily on the general law of contracts, which is not binding. Consumer contract law should remain in close contact with general contract law. In general, the best solution is to have essentially the same rules for consumer contracts and all other contracts, some of which are mandatory for consumers (and in other non-compulsory cases).